Perspectivas Teóricas do Mainstream da Administração Estratégica: Uma Meta-Síntese

Jonathan Simões Freitas, Júlia Araújo Tiso Mudrik, Paulo Vítor Guerra, Lin Chih Cheng, Carlos Alberto Gonçalves

Resumo


Na última década, vários artigos foram publicados visando revisar o desenvolvimento da pesquisa em administração estratégica (AE). Nesses trabalhos, a investigação dos fatores explicativos da heterogeneidade de desempenho entre firmas é identificada como a motivação distintiva dessa disciplina acadêmica. Nesse sentido, a vertente denominada “estratégia-como-conteúdo” é identificada como o mainstream, enfatizando aspectos substantivos (i.e. tipos de estruturas e estratégias) para a explicação das diferenças de desempenho organizacional. Nesse contexto, há uma notável convergência desses artigos no que se refere à descrição da evolução teórica dessa corrente de pesquisa. Contudo, nenhum desses trabalhos, isoladamente, fornece esse quadro geral a eles subjacente. Sintetizar essa visão por eles compartilhada acerca do desenvolvimento teórico do mainstream de AE, refletindo sobre as principais mudanças ocorridas, é, portanto, o objetivo deste artigo. Nesse sentido, uma estrutura sintética embasada nas revisões de literatura da pesquisa em AE é proposta, caracterizando-se as principais perspectivas teóricas da vertente de estratégia-como-conteúdo e fundamentando-se análises acerca da evolução que esta sofreu nas últimas décadas. Obras escritas mais importantes, principais fatores explicativos apontados para as diferenças de desempenho entre as firmas, bem como contribuições teóricas mais relevantes são identificadas para cada perspectiva; padrões no desenvolvimento teórico dessa corrente são também discutidos e tendências promissoras, salientadas. Espera-se, portanto, que este trabalho contribua tanto para a prática administrativa de estrategistas, fornecendo um framework sintético dos principais fatores que podem influenciar o desempenho de suas organizações, quanto para a orientação de novos pesquisadores na área, auxiliando-os a melhor delinearem os posicionamentos teóricos que adotarão.

Palavras-chave


Administração Estratégica; Mainstream; Perspectivas Teóricas

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


ALCHIAN, A. A.; DEMSETZ, H. Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62, 777-795. 1992.

AMBROSINI, V. e BOWMAN, C. What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29–49, 2009.

ANDREWS, K. The concepts of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1971.

ANSOFF, H. I. Corporate strategy. New York: McGraw Hill, 1965.

BAIN, J. S. Barriers to new competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1956.

BAIN, J. S. Industrial organization. 2. Ed. New York: Wiley, 1968.

BARNARD, C. I. The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1938.

BARNEY, J.B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120. 1991.

BARTLETT, C.A. Multinational structural evolution: the changing decision environment in international divisions. Tese de doutorado, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA, EUA, 1979.

BERLE, A. A.; MEANS, G. C. The modern corporation and private property. New York: MacMillan, 1932.

BOWER, J.L. Managing the Resource Allocation Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.

BOWMAN, E.H., SINGH, H. e THOMAS, H. The domain of strategic management: history and evolution. In: PETTIGREW, A., THOMAS H. e WHITTINGTON, R. (Eds). Hanbook of strategy and management. London: Sage, 2002, pp. 31-52.

BURNS, T.; STALKER, G. M. The management of innovation. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1961.

CAVES, R. E.; PORTER, M. E. From entry barriers to mobility barriers: conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, 241-261. 1977.

CHANDLER, A. D. Strategy and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.

CHEN, M. J. Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21, 100-134. 1996.

CHILD, J. Organization structure, environment, and performance: the role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6, 1-22. 1972.

COASE, R. H. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386-406. 1937.

CONNER, K. An historical comparison of resource-based logic and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: do we have a new theory of the firm here? Journal of Management, 17, 121-154. 1991.

CUMMINGS, S.; DAELLENBACH, U. A guide to the future of strategy? The history of Long Range Planning. Long Range Planning, 42, 234-263. 2009.

CYERT, R. M.; MARCH, J. G. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.

DOZ, Y.L. National policies and multinational management. Tese de doutorado, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA, EUA, 1976.

ELBANNA, S. Strategic decision-making: process perspectives. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8, 1-20. 2006.

FAMA, E. F. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288-307. 1980.

FAMA, E. F.; JENSEN, M. C. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325. 1983.

FAYOL, H. General and industrial management. New York: Pitman, 1949.

FERREIRA, J. J.; FERNANDES, C. I.; RATTEN, V. A co-citation bibliometric analysis of strategic management research. Scientometrics, 109, 1-32. 2016.

FURRER, O.; THOMAS, H.; GOUSSEVSKAIA, A. The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: a content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 1-23. 2008.

GHOSHAL, S. The innovative multinational: a differentiated network of organizational roles and management processes. Tese de doutorado, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA, EUA, 1986.

GONÇALVES, C.A., MUNIZ, R.M., FREITAS, J.S. e CHENG, L.C. Modelo para avaliação de desempenho organizacional: uma proposta para orientação da pesquisa entre Brasil e União Européia na área de estratégia. In Silva, J.R. & Barbosa, A.C.Q. (Eds). Estado, Empresas e Sociedade: um Mosaico Luso-Brasileiro. Lisboa: Edições Colibri: 2009, pp. 65-102.

GRANT, M. J.; BOOTH, A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26 (2), 91-108, 2009.

GRIMM, C. M.; SMITH, K. G. Strategy as action: industry rivalry and coordination. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing, 1997.

GUERRAS-MARTÍN, L. A.; MADHOK, A.; e MONTORO-SÁNCHEZ, A. M. The evolution of strategic management research: Recent trends and current directions. Business Research Quarterly, 17, 69-76, 2014.

HAMBRICK, D. C.; MASON, P. A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206. 1984.

HATTEN, K. J.; SCHENDEL, D. E. Heterogeneity within an industry. Journal of Industrial Economics, 10, 399-411. 1977.

HERRMANN, P. Evolution of strategic management: the need for new dominant designs. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7, 111-130. 2005.

HITT, M.A.; IRELAND, D.R.; CAMP, S.M.; SEXTON, D.L. Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 479-491. 2001.

HOSKISSON, R.E.; HITT, M.A.; WAN, W.P.; YIU, D. Theory and research in strategic management: swings of pendulum. Journal of Management, 25, 417–456. 1999.

HUNT, M. S. Competition in the major home appliance industry, 1960–1970. Tese de Doutorado, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA, EUA, 1972.

HUTZSCHENREUTER, T.; KLEINDIENST, I. Strategy-process research: what have we learned and what is still to be explored. Journal of Management, 32, 673-720. 2006.

JENSEN, M. C.; MECKLING, W. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. 1976.

KARNANI, A.; WERNERFELT, B. Multiple point competition. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 87-96. 1985.

KENWORTHY, T. P.; VERBEKE, A. The future of strategic management research: Assessing the quality of theory borrowing. European Managament Journal, 33, 179-190. 2015.

KHALIFA, A.S. The “strategy frame” and the four Es of strategy drivers. Management Decision, 46(6), 894-917. 2008.

KOGUT, B.; ZANDER, U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383-397. 1992.

KOTTER, J. P. The general managers. New York: Free Press, 1982.

LAWRENCE P.; LORSCH, J. Organization and environment: managing differentiation and integration. Irwin: Homewood, IL, 1967.

LEARNED, E. P.; CHRISTENSEN, C. R.; ANDREWS, K. R.; GUTH, W. D. Business policy: text and case (rev. ed.). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, 1965/1969.

LOCKETT, A., THOMPSON, S. e MORGENSTERN, U. Reflections on the development of the RBV. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 9-28, 2009.

MAHONEY, T.J.; MCGAHAN, A.M. The field of strategic management within the evolving science of strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(1), 79-99. 2007.

MARCH, J. C.; SIMON, H. A. Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958.

MASON, E. S. Price and production policies of large scale enterprises. American Economic Review, 29, 61-74. 1939.

MELLAHI, K.; SMINIA, H. Guest Editors’ Introduction: The frontiers of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 1-7. 2009.

MINTZBERG, H. The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.

NAG, R.; HAMBRICK, D.C.; CHEN, M-J. What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 935-955. 2007.

NERUR, S.P.; RASHEED, A.A.; NATARAJAN, V. The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: an author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 319-336. 2008.

NEWMAN, H. Strategic groups and the structure-performance relationship. Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 417-427. 1978.

PENG, M.W. e PLEGGENKUHLE-MILES, E.G. Current debates in global strategy. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 51–68, 2009.

PENROSE, E. T. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley. 1959.

PETTIGREW, A.M. The awakening giant: continuity and change in ICI. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985.

PHELAN, S.E.; FERREIRA, M.; SALVADOR, R. The first twenty years of the Strategic Management Journal. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1161-1168. 2002.

PODSAKOFF, P. M., MACKENZIE, S. B., BACHRACH, D. G., & PODSAKOFF, N. P. The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 2005, pp. 473-488.

POLANYI, M. The tacit dimension. New York: Anchor Day, 1966.

PORTER, M. E. The structure within industries and companies’ performance. Review of Economics and Statistics, 61, 214-228. 1979.

PORTER, M. E. Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press, 1980.

PORTER, M. E. Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press, 1985.

POZZEBON, M. The influence of a structurationist view on strategic management research. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 247-272. 2004.

PRAHALAD, C. K.; HAMEL, G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68 (3), 79-91. 1990.

PRAHALAD, C.K. The strategic process in a multinational corporation. Tese de doutorado, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA, EUA, 1975.

QUINN, J.B. Strategies for change: logical incrementalism. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, 1980.

RAMOS-RODRÍGUEZ, A-R.; RUÍZ-NAVARRO, J. Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980-2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 981-1004. 2004.

RUMELT, R.P., SCHENDEL, D.E. e TEECE, D.J. (Eds.) Fundamental issues in strategy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1994.

SCHENDEL, D. E.; HOFER, C. W. Strategic management: a new view of business policy and planning. Boston: Little, Brown & Co, 1979.

SELZNICK, P. Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Harper & Row, 1957.

SIMON, H. A. Administrative behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1945.

SMINIA, H. Process research in strategy formation: theory, methodology, and relevance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 97-125. 2009.

SPENDER, J. C.; GRANT, R. M. Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue), 5-9. 1996.

TEECE, D. J.; PISANO, G.; SHUEN, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533. 1997.

THOMPSON, J. D. Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1967.

WERNERFELT, B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180. 1984.

WILKINSON, A.; MELLAHI, K. Organizational failure introduction to the special issue. Long Range Planning, 38, 233-238. 2005.

WILLIAMSON, O. E. Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press, 1975.

WILLIAMSON, O. E. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press, 1985.

WOODWARD, J. Industrial organization: theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1965.

ZANDER, U.; KOGUT, B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test. Organizational Science, 6, p. 76-92, 1995.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24883%2Fric.v7i1.211

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.


 Atelier Brasil
Rua Pe. Guilherme Pompeu, 01, Centro
06501-055, Santana de Parnaíba, São Paulo, Brazil
(ISSN 2236-210X – DOI 10.24883)

Contato institucional: senioreditorial@inteligenciacompetitivarev.com.br



  Indexadores e Diretórios                    
             


SitesDOMÍNIO PÚBLICO CAPES l IAFIE l SCIP l IAFIE l USP l FMU   ABRAIC SEER/IBICT  l ISSN  l  EventosANPAD  l   NormasABNT

 

Visualização no Brasil e no Mundo por localização e período: